Discussing Metaethics with Lance Bush

Intrinsicism, Subjectivism, Objectivism

I recently had a thought-provoking discussion with Lance Bush on his podcast, Lance Independent. And I greatly appreciate his active-minded, deliberate approach to ideas.

Unlike so many philosophers today, Lance genuinely seeks conceptual clarity. He demands evidence in support of ideas, defines his terms, draws crucial distinctions, and uses precise language. He’s a breath of fresh philosophic air.

In this episode, we discussed realism vs. anti-realism in metaethics, exploring the differences between

• Intrinsicism: the notion that “good” and “value” exist “out there”—independent of human minds, perspectives, or needs—as intrinsic features of the world;

• Subjectivism: the view that “good” and “value” are merely in the mind—entirely made up by human beings, whether individually or collectively—with no grounding in reality; and

• Objectivism: the view that “good” and “value” are neither intrinsic nor subjective, but relational—arising from recognitions (via one’s mind) of certain facts of reality (“out there”), including the requirements of human life, given the kind of animal we are.

I enjoyed this conversation, and I look forward to speaking with Lance again.

Watch the discussion below—and share your thoughts in the comments. If you haven’t already, I encourage you to follow Lance on YouTube and Substack. I’ve gained clarity from his straightforward approach to ideas. I think you will, too.